Stand to Reason
User Name Password
Register Now Forget your User Name or Password?
All active news articles

Search Stand to Reason

   This Week's Broadcast
   Stand to Reason's Blog
   Video Resources
   Content Categories
eMail to a Friend
Print This Page

The Socratic Method

By Ken Samples

divider

The method which Socrates employed in his philosophical analyses has five readily distinguishable characteristics:


1. The method is skeptical. It begins with Socrates' real or professed ignorance of the truth of the matter under discussion. This is the Socratic irony which seemed to some of his listeners an insincere pretense, but which was undoubtedly an expression of Socrates' genuine intellectual humility. This skepticism Socrates shared with the Sophists and, in his adoption of it, he may very well have been influenced by them. But whereas the Sophistic skepticism was definitive and final, the Socratic is tentative and provisional; Socrates' doubt and assumed ignorance is an indispensable first step in the pursuit of knowledge.

2. It is conversational. It employs the dialogue not only as a didactic device, but as a technique for the actual discovery of opinions amongst men, there are truths upon which all men can agree, Socrates proceeds to unfold such truths by discussion or by question and answer. Beginning with a popular or hastily formed conception proposed by one of the members of the company or taken from the poets or some other traditional source, Socrates subjects this notion to severe criticism, as a result of which a more adequate conception emerges. His method, in this aspect, is often described as the maieutic method. It is the art of intellectual midwifery, which brings other men's ideas to birth. It is also known as the dialectical method or the method of elenchus.

3. It is conceptual or definitional in that it sets as the goal of knowledge the acquisition of concepts, such as the ethical concepts of justice, piety, wisdom, courage and the like. Socrates tacitly assumes that truth is embodied in correct definition. Precise definition of terms is held to be the first step in the problem solving process.

4. The Socratic method is empirical or inductive in that the proposed definitions are criticized by reference to particular instances. Socrates always tested definitions by recourse to common experience and to general usages.

5. The method is deductive in that a given definition is tested by drawing out its implications, by deducing its consequences. The definitional method of Socrates is a real contribution to the logic of philosophical inquiry. It inspired the dialectical method of Plato and exerted a not inconsiderable influence on the logic Aristotle. *

* A good description of the method is given by Wilhgelm Winelband in A History of Philosophy, pp. 96ff, and an appraisal of its value and limitations by Bertrand Russell in A History of Western Philosophy, pp. 92ff.

{The above material is used by permission of Ken Samples, Director of the Augustine Fellowship, (909) 654-7634, P.O. Box 23, Hemet, CA 92543.}

©1998 Ken Samples. Reproduction permitted for non-commercial use only.
For more information, contact Stand to Reason at 1438 East 33rd St., Signal Hill, CA 90755
(800) 2-REASON (562) 595-7333 www.str.org

Speakers
Greg Koukl
Brett Kunkle
Alan Shlemon
Master Calendar

Store
US Store
Canada Store
International
Store

Resources
Ambassadors Creed
Commentaries and Articles
STR Radio
STR Blog
Solid Ground Archives
Mentoring Letter Archives
Lesson Outlines
Quick Thoughts
Q&A
STR Podcasts
Video Resources

Curriculum
Ambassador Basic
Curriculum (ABC)
Links
Organizations
Authors & Speakers
Resources & Research
Magazines & Articles
Bio-ethics
Education & Events
Opposing Viewpoints
Blogs
Other Sites

About STR
Help Promote STR
Mission, Vision
and Values

Statement of Faith
History of STR
STR Staff
Endorsements &
Testimonials

Contact Us

Donate
Stand to Reason
Brett Kunkle
Alan Shlemon

© 2005 Stand to Reason ARR | 1438 East 33rd Street, Signal Hill, CA 90755
Voicemail (800) 2-REASON TM | Local phone (562) 595-7333 | Fax (562) 595-7332 | questions@str.org